Re: [LAU] Lightweight WM that can be used without any issue with audio applications

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 - 6:46 am

On 08/26/2014 07:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

Hmm, what're your issues with "bloat" in Xfce4? Has worked here for many
years on some pretty limited (old) hardware.

Only times I've had to go to something less "bloated" I like OpenBox.
Only had to do that for memory-intensive graphics processing, so I don't
recall encountering any problems with QJackCtl.

--
David W. Jones
gnome@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [Bulk] Re: Lightweight WM that can be used without..., Jeremy Jongepier, (Wed Aug 27, 12:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Lightweight WM that can be used without any issue ..., david, (Wed Aug 27, 6:46 am)