Re: [LAU] control surface design - was - Jack transport

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fons Adriaensen <fons@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2014 - 4:13 am

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:13:41AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:

That is what I am seeing.

> It would be possible to define some standards, e.g. for

That would be MIDI.

> any such standards are destined to fail.

Concidering OSC has been around for 12 years(v1.0, 17 years since first
implementation), it may have already. The specification is the most
non-specific thing I have ever seen. From the home page it seems to have
not moved at all from 2009 (waiting for funding so 1.1 can be released).
It would seem almost the same thing could be done with an ssh session
using arbitrary strings.

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Jack transport - was - Ardour/Muse Jack tempo lock, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 11, 10:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Jack transport - was - Ardour/Muse Jack tempo lock, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 13, 10:59 am)
Re: [LAU] Jack transport - was - Ardour/Muse Jack tempo lock, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 13, 9:28 pm)
[LAU] control surface design - was - Jack transport, Len Ovens, (Wed Aug 13, 6:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] control surface design - was - Jack transport, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 13, 9:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] control surface design - was - Jack transport, Len Ovens, (Thu Aug 14, 4:13 am)
Re: [LAU] control surface design - was - Jack transport, Will Godfrey, (Thu Aug 14, 6:46 am)
Re: [LAU] Jack transport - was - Ardour/Muse Jack tempo lock, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Aug 13, 11:26 am)