Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performance differences

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2014 - 8:24 pm

On 04/17/2014 02:35 AM, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:

It might be worth it. My UCA202 running on my old Celeron based laptop
couldn't do duplex at all; both audio signals were noisy and low-volume.
On my i7 laptop, it does duplex just fine. Using JACK2 in both cases.

--
David W. Jones
gnome@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performance d..., Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Apr 17, 1:54 am)
Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performan..., Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Apr 17, 12:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performan..., david, (Thu Apr 17, 8:24 pm)