Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performance differences

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2014 - 2:32 am

PS:

On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 04:11 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

IOW what's not available can't be optimized using an EQ, IOW you need
the complete production chain to compare "quality" and "quality" isn't
low latency only. "Quality" for my taste does include latency, but also
time accuracy (for MIDI it's jitter), sound quality and a sane
work-flow. Some unrealistic test-scenarios say big nothing about real
usage.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performance d..., Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Apr 17, 1:54 am)
Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performan..., Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Apr 17, 12:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performan..., Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Apr 17, 2:32 am)