Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, March 7, 2014 - 11:17 pm

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:56:06PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:

> How then do they handle the noise floor when they are running rms 27db

I suspect you are mixing up physical voltage levels in dBm and
digital levels here (since 4 + 23 = 27).

The -23 dB standard loudness reference of ebur128 is relative
to digital peak level, not to 0 dBm.

Ciao,

--
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Jaromír Mikeš, (Fri Mar 7, 12:48 am)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Robin Gareus, (Tue Mar 18, 11:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Shani Pribadi, (Fri Mar 7, 6:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Jaromír Mikeš, (Fri Mar 7, 10:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Shani Pribadi, (Sat Mar 8, 6:59 am)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Fri Mar 7, 1:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, grh, (Sun Mar 16, 9:47 am)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Jaromír Mikeš, (Fri Mar 7, 10:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Gene Heskett, (Fri Mar 7, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Mar 7, 11:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] ebur128 batch processing, Gene Heskett, (Fri Mar 7, 11:36 pm)