Re: [LAU] [LAD] JACK latency API clarifications

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lieven Moors <lievenmoors@...>, Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, February 21, 2014 - 8:29 pm

--f46d0443067037f9d504f2f07bb9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Lieven Moors wrote:

> Aren't most clients checking for

if they are, then they are doing it wrong.

--f46d0443067037f9d504f2f07bb9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Lieven Moors &lt=
;lievenmoors@gma=
il.com
> wrote:
=A0Aren't most clients checking for
the sample rate in the process callback anyway?=
if they are, then they are doing it wrong.=A0=

--f46d0443067037f9d504f2f07bb9--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [LAD] JACK latency API clarifications, Lieven Moors, (Fri Feb 21, 8:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] JACK latency API clarifications, Lieven Moors, (Fri Feb 21, 8:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] JACK latency API clarifications, Paul Davis, (Fri Feb 21, 8:29 pm)