Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Will Godfrey <willgodfrey@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, February 15, 2014 - 10:42 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 17:28:46 +0000
Will Godfrey wrote:

> Don't know if this is any help, but in the current version of

Thanks, it's of great help, as ATM it seems the only way I'll have some
success with this :) The trouble is Hydrogen, Ardour and Rosegarden are
all following Jack Transport allright, but I can't see how to declare
Rosegarden as master in the preferences (nor Ardour as slave) -
Hydrogen instead has a "J. Master" button, which is unpressed.

Right now I have a tempo ramp up defined in rosegarden, and as the
transport goes through it I can see the BPMs changing in Rosegarden,
but not in Ardour nor in Hydrogen... and the playback speed remains the
same. The transport though is indeed syncronized (hitting pause pauses
all three programs and so on).

Maybe there were some recent changes to how Jack Transport works? Am
I missing something or is this behaviour indeed strange?

renato
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS/+1VAAoJEBz6xFdttjrfMk4H/iPQYmyWXkOvgTjcNzx4ExKV
gUiUc2O8W5Z0SUOis35/XW0ixRQzLNz6WcE0BnTUfXQdck/Uaf0t79MuGytT+2Ri
dWsOURED+DUTH2qITC3oqy0PhO1zS5ps/sP4t6RsSD8ZqIIMo9At7u/iv1ZYOzTd
Urer25KDDVqvf1+714FnscG46X4wQZ5nbIhkyvO4KZ73DzHcEuKXfZg+tA+cx2H3
M4MDnzbZdazPBtcf10qdEs5TGdXhnG6mVl23sX7IpW/YN4zqOnhfDFCwEbZrRdJL
kVjPOYQu5VQBxW/8cIHRlLgH0ZDSZOVLEWqqi3mIMm76BQW9NUCAiX6US9a8alg=
=CieA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Renato, (Fri Feb 14, 10:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Edgar Aichinger, (Sat Feb 15, 9:03 am)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Renato, (Sat Feb 15, 5:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Will Godfrey, (Sat Feb 15, 5:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Renato, (Sat Feb 15, 10:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Paul Davis, (Sun Feb 16, 1:19 am)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Renato, (Sun Feb 16, 1:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Paul Davis, (Sun Feb 16, 2:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] progressive time stretch, Renato, (Sat Feb 15, 10:56 pm)