Re: [LAU] jaaa

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 - 7:23 pm

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:02:48PM +0000, Will Godfrey wrote:

> I've just been using this to do some tests on an Amp and it's produced some

The F-scale is linear because the resolution of the analyser is
independent of frequency. It provides as much 'detail' between
10.1 and 10.2 kHz as it does between 100 and 200 Hz. Using a log
scale would mean that most of that information is thrown away.

> Is this a practical future option?

It hasn't been for the last 10 years, and that is likely to
stay that way. For the type of measurements that JAAA is
designed for a log scale wouldn't make much sense.

The only type of measurement that is usually presented with
a log frequency scale is the traditional 'frequency response',
plot and Jaaa isn't the right tool to create that.

Ciao,

--
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] jaaa, Will Godfrey, (Tue Feb 11, 6:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] jaaa, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 11, 7:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] jaaa, Peter P., (Tue Feb 11, 8:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] jaaa, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 11, 8:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] jaaa, mark hadman, (Tue Feb 11, 6:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] jaaa, Arnold Krille, (Tue Feb 11, 7:19 pm)