Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, January 3, 2014 - 1:12 am

Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> This delay is roughy inversely proportional to the transition

Thanks for speaking up, Fons. I learn something new in
everything you post.

--
Joel Roth

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Joel Roth, (Wed Jan 1, 1:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jan 1, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Joel Roth, (Fri Jan 3, 1:12 am)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Jan 1, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Jan 1, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Bill Gribble, (Thu Jan 2, 11:50 am)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Thu Jan 2, 12:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Bill Gribble, (Thu Jan 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Jan 1, 5:18 pm)