Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, January 2, 2014 - 5:25 am

Harry van Haaren wrote:

> Perhaps I'm missing something, are you doing mulitple passes

For a live submix, the routing I want to use is exemplified by:

system:capture_5 --> Nama:sax_in_1 --( ecasound )--> Nama:sax_out_1
Nama:sax_out_1 --( ecasound )--> system:playback_11

If I understand correctly, the latency not due to Ecasound
in this graph is the soundcard roundtrip plus the number of
hops which contribute (frames*buffers/sample-rate) latency
per.

I'm adding one more hop, so that would be 3ms
at 64/2, 4ms at 64/3, and 5.3ms at 128/2.

Regards,

Joel

> Cheers, -Harry

--
Joel Roth

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Joel Roth, (Wed Jan 1, 1:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jan 1, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Jan 1, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Jan 1, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Joel Roth, (Thu Jan 2, 5:25 am)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Bill Gribble, (Thu Jan 2, 11:50 am)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Thu Jan 2, 12:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Bill Gribble, (Thu Jan 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Jan 1, 5:18 pm)