Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 1, 2014 - 5:18 pm

On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 13:56 +0000, Harry van Haaren wrote:

Filters of audio devices usually are optimized for 48 KHz usage, but on
this list there often where discussions about this issue and IIRC 96 KHz
are indeed used to lower latency for live usage.

I recommend to search the archive.

Happy New Year!
Ralf

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Joel Roth, (Wed Jan 1, 1:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jan 1, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Jan 1, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Jan 1, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Bill Gribble, (Thu Jan 2, 11:50 am)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Harry van Haaren, (Thu Jan 2, 12:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Bill Gribble, (Thu Jan 2, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Use of 96 kHz sample rate to lower latency, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Jan 1, 5:18 pm)