On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 10:47 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote:
[LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Fons Adriaensen fons at linuxaudio.org
Fri Sep 20 20:24:12 UTC 2013
Previous message: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Next message: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:04:57PM +0200, Felix Homann wrote:
> Am 20.09.2013 21:56 schrieb "Fons Adriaensen" :
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Felix Homann
> > > Would you mind Maurizio Gavioli to play around with your
> > No.
> > > don't think so. So why do you mind him sharing his
> > Why do you think I should feel the same about both ?
> Because of the things I have written and you didn't comment
You mean this:
> You might argue that he better not published his toying
around. But then
> again you possibly forced him to do so: Just imagine he gave a
> someone. Then by the license *you* have chosen for your code
> *obliged* to share his code - no matter how good or worth
publishing it is.
I did not force him to anything. Giving a binary to anyone is
decision, not mine. And all that the original license obliges
do in that case is to give the sources the same person.
> A 'fork' on github is a convenient way to comply with GPL
'Convenient' is the key word here. Some people only think
of what's 'convenient' to them, everything else is too much
for their simple minds.
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
Linux-audio-user mailing list