Re: [LAU] Aeolus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <tim@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, September 19, 2013 - 9:55 pm

--e89a8ff1ca782365f304e6c39db5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Tim Orford wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:37:28AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

Not at all!

> The project is not intended to be competitive with Ardour and is likely

No issues here.

> We have had conversations on LAD and IRC but we just have very different

Good luck with that! Mr Liles adn the Non project might appreciate your
efforts more directly though :)

My apologies for forgetting that we had, in fact spoken about this stuff.

--p

--e89a8ff1ca782365f304e6c39db5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Tim Orford <<=
a href=3D"mailto:tim@orford.org" target=3D"_blank">tim@orford.org> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:37:28AM -0400, Pa=
ul Davis wrote:

ayyi that is a fork of ardour's

> acknowledgement of what s/he was up to). Whoever is doing is is still<=
br>

br>
e
nd

Hi Paul

I am the main Ayyi Project developer.

I sincerely hope that the use of your code hasn't caused any offence.Not at all! =A0

The project is not intended to be competitive with Ardour and is likely
to remain merely a proof-of-concept. If I you have any objections, please
let me know as I would be very keen to accommodate you. For example if you<=
br>
dislike the use of the name "ardourd", I will change that.No issues here.=A0

We have had conversations on LAD and IRC but we just have very different
ideas about what a DAW should be. I have a great deal of respect for
Ardour and all the great work you and others have done and ideally I would<=
br>
very much like to contribute, something that a more modular approach would<=
br>
help with.Good luck with that! Mr Liles ad=
n the Non project might appreciate your efforts more directly though :)=
My apologies for forgetting that=
we had, in fact spoken about this stuff.
--p

--e89a8ff1ca782365f304e6c39db5--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 18, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Rob Kudla, (Wed Sep 18, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Sep 19, 12:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 19, 2:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Tim Orford, (Thu Sep 19, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 19, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Sep 20, 1:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 19, 7:54 am)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, drew Roberts, (Wed Sep 18, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Guido Aulisi, (Wed Sep 18, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Julien Claassen, (Wed Sep 18, 10:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, J. Liles, (Wed Sep 18, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, , (Thu Sep 19, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 18, 10:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Sep 19, 4:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Sep 19, 4:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, hermann meyer, (Thu Sep 19, 3:31 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Rafael Vega, (Wed Sep 18, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Sep 18, 9:55 pm)