On Wednesday 18 September 2013 17:16:38 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Fine so far. I would be happy if people were to fork some of my
Not a big problem. If this were to occur with some of my stuff in isolation, I
might think it a not wise move on t heir part but I don't think I would be
> and both are taking Aeolus in a direction I do not
Fine, but that is part of the whole Freedom game. People can take my song
lyrics and re-write them to convey a message that goes directly against what
I belive in. That is what free people can do. I don't want the level of
control over others that would allow me to prevent this. I would be happy if
I could figure how to make such insightful arguments that people would not
but that is a whole different ball game.
> Gavioli has even added his 'copyright' to the
Here, you are being unclear and if it means one of the things I think it
could, Ican see you properly having a very big issue with this.
You say he has *even* added his 'copyright' to the sources of the libraries
that Aeolus depends on.
Does this mean he has also added his 'copyright' to Aeolus?
And when you say *added* his 'copyright', do you mean added his copyright to
the existing copyright notice or do you mean replaced the copyright notice
with one indicating he is the copyright holder for the complete work?
If copyright notices are getting replaced rather than updated with correct
additions, this is a serious issue.
I hope this issue gets sorted out to you satisfaction one way or another. I
would hate to see your efforts removed from the Free Software and linmux
all the best,
Linux-audio-user mailing list