Re: [LAU] Aeolus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - 10:23 pm

On Wednesday 18 September 2013 17:16:38 Fons Adriaensen wrote:

Fine so far. I would be happy if people were to fork some of my
inconsequential stuff.

Not a big problem. If this were to occur with some of my stuff in isolation, I
might think it a not wise move on t heir part but I don't think I would be
too miffed.

> and both are taking Aeolus in a direction I do not

Fine, but that is part of the whole Freedom game. People can take my song
lyrics and re-write them to convey a message that goes directly against what
I belive in. That is what free people can do. I don't want the level of
control over others that would allow me to prevent this. I would be happy if
I could figure how to make such insightful arguments that people would not
but that is a whole different ball game.

> Gavioli has even added his 'copyright' to the

Here, you are being unclear and if it means one of the things I think it
could, Ican see you properly having a very big issue with this.

You say he has *even* added his 'copyright' to the sources of the libraries
that Aeolus depends on.

Does this mean he has also added his 'copyright' to Aeolus?

And when you say *added* his 'copyright', do you mean added his copyright to
the existing copyright notice or do you mean replaced the copyright notice
with one indicating he is the copyright holder for the complete work?

If copyright notices are getting replaced rather than updated with correct
additions, this is a serious issue.

I hope this issue gets sorted out to you satisfaction one way or another. I
would hate to see your efforts removed from the Free Software and linmux
audio realm.

all the best,

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 18, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Rob Kudla, (Wed Sep 18, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Sep 19, 12:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 19, 2:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Tim Orford, (Thu Sep 19, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 19, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Sep 20, 1:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 19, 7:54 am)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, drew Roberts, (Wed Sep 18, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Guido Aulisi, (Wed Sep 18, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Julien Claassen, (Wed Sep 18, 10:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, J. Liles, (Wed Sep 18, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, , (Thu Sep 19, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 18, 10:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Sep 19, 4:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Sep 19, 4:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, hermann meyer, (Thu Sep 19, 3:31 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Rafael Vega, (Wed Sep 18, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Sep 18, 9:55 pm)