[LAU] Aeolus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Audio Users <linux-audio-user@...>, Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>
Subject: [LAU] Aeolus
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - 9:16 pm

Hello all,

It has come to my attention that there are ATM at least two
'forks' of Aeolus. The first by the MuseScore team, the second
by one Maurizio Gavioli.

Neither of them even had the decency to let me know of their
work, and both are taking Aeolus in a direction I do not
approve of. Gavioli has even added his 'copyright' to the
sources of the libraries that Aeolus depends on but which
are not part of its source distribution. Apparently the
intention is to release incompatible versions of those as
well.

If this is typical for the attitude taken by the Linux Audio
community then my motivation to contribute to it will take
a serious blow.

As announced previously, there will be a fully reworked
release of Aeolus next year (on the occasion of its 10th
birthday). Apart from major improvements to the audio code
it will be completely OSC controlled. None of this will be
compatible with the forks of course, they'll find themselves
instantly obsolete. And I will make sure that this sort of
thing won't happen again, even if that means a more restrictive
license.

Ciao,

--
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 18, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Rob Kudla, (Wed Sep 18, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Sep 19, 12:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 19, 2:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Tim Orford, (Thu Sep 19, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 19, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Sep 20, 1:01 am)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 19, 7:54 am)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, drew Roberts, (Wed Sep 18, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Guido Aulisi, (Wed Sep 18, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Aeolus, Julien Claassen, (Wed Sep 18, 10:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, J. Liles, (Wed Sep 18, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, , (Thu Sep 19, 2:55 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Sep 18, 10:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Josh Lawrence, (Thu Sep 19, 4:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Monty Montgomery, (Thu Sep 19, 4:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, hermann meyer, (Thu Sep 19, 3:31 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Rafael Vega, (Wed Sep 18, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] Aeolus, Hartmut Noack, (Wed Sep 18, 9:55 pm)