[LAU] OT: Terrible open source definition

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - 10:23 am

--047d7b67749a47333b04e6190158
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Entirely OT, but I had a lecture at Uni yesterday and the first slide was
talking about Eclipse and how it's 'open source, so it means it's free to
use for both commercial and non-commercial purposes'.
Needless to say, I cringed at the "definition".

We now return you to your regularly scheduled linux audio
related discussions.

--047d7b67749a47333b04e6190158
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Entirely OT, but I had a lecture at Uni yesterday and=
the first slide was talking about Eclipse and how it's 'open sourc=
e, so it means it's free to use for both commercial and non-commercial =
purposes'.
Needless to say, I cringed at the "definition".=
=A0We now return you to your regularly scheduled linux audio rel=
ated=A0discussions.

--047d7b67749a47333b04e6190158--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] OT: Terrible open source definition, Andrew C, (Wed Sep 11, 10:23 am)
Re: [LAU] OT: Terrible open source definition, Philipp , (Wed Sep 11, 1:16 pm)