Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, August 19, 2013 - 5:39 pm

--001a11c2c338fcae3d04e450690a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

>

Whether something is art or not is typically a bogus question. This kind
of argument confuses whether something "is" art with its quality as art.

The evidence that something is art is that it has been composed or intended
as art.
If you want to further remove the role of its creator from that definition,
you can say that whether something is or is not art is simply self-evident.

Everything else is in your interpretation and your judgment of its
qualities.

--001a11c2c338fcae3d04e450690a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On S=
at, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl=
.net
> wrote:

There's no clear boarder between art and not art.
Whether something is art or not is typ=
ically a bogus question.=A0 This kind of argument confuses whether somethin=
g "is" art with its quality as art.The evidenc=
e that something is art is that it has been composed or intended as art.
If you want to further remove the role of its creator from that definition,=
you can say that whether something is or is not art is simply self-evident=
.Everything else is in your interpretation and your judg=
ment of its qualities.

--001a11c2c338fcae3d04e450690a--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Art's suitability for anything, James Harkins, (Sat Aug 17, 5:19 am)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, david, (Sat Aug 17, 9:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Aug 17, 9:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Brent Busby, (Sat Aug 17, 6:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, James Harkins, (Mon Aug 19, 5:56 am)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Jeremy Jongepier, (Sat Aug 17, 7:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Aug 17, 7:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Charles Z Henry, (Mon Aug 19, 5:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Neil, (Sat Aug 17, 8:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Brent Busby, (Sat Aug 17, 7:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Len Ovens, (Sat Aug 17, 6:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Aug 17, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Aug 17, 9:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Art's suitability for anything, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Aug 17, 10:05 am)