Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: J. Liles <malnourite@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, August 16, 2013 - 6:27 pm

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 11:14 -0700, J. Liles wrote:

The reason for this is coverage, but the target of FLOSS is to provide a
quality level. Again, it's not black and white. If music apps shouldn't
be perfect it's one thing, but regarding to e.g. security, privacy even
this disclaimer won't protect an evil coder against a lawsuit.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 15, 11:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Leonardo Palomares, (Fri Aug 16, 5:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Aug 16, 6:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Aug 17, 10:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Aug 18, 11:25 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Harry van Haaren, (Thu Aug 15, 11:42 am)