Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Oh my , here I go too...
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, J. Liles wrote:
The list has been since I remember a place to announce audio works, not
only software, and when someone give us links of their work, it happened
often that he got critics from listeners, so he can fix some of his audio
work to that individual ears.
But anyway the audio creator/producer has the last word, like the same on
the side of software givers.
This said with all my respect for audio and software creators.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Oh my , here I go too...On Fri, =
Aug 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, J. Liles <firstname.lastname@example.org>=
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Egor Sanin <egor.sanin@=
I shall contiribute my voice, too.
On 8/16/13, hermann meyer <email@example.com> wrote:
It is important to note that time is a finite quantity in the physica=
reality we are all a part of. =C2=A0This fact limits the amount of "wo=
any one person can perform.
"Work" can be of different types. =C2=A0The comment above suggest=
s to me
the opinion that the "work" of developers is of higher value beca=
to become a developer one has to "move their ass." =C2=A0The prob=
this statement when talking about audio software is that just having
the software is pointless. =C2=A0The software is made to be used to create<=
music, or at least some sort of audio output. =C2=A0People producing this
output, often called musicians, also need to do a lot of "work." =
be a musician, one must also "move their ass."
The "work" of musicians is different, but no less valuable than t=
"work" of developers, so let's not get our egos too hot here.=
because one person does not have enough time to perform developer
"work" because most of his time is spent doing musician "wor=
research the amount of music that OP has produced with Linux audio
software) is no reason to make him a scapegoat.
And a not on the "goal" of OP's podcasts (I am not speaking f=
rather simply providing my interpretation): a piece of criticism is
usually created to generate discussion. =C2=A0In the most basic form, this<=
is enough of a reason to do something.
An interesting point. As a=
though experiment: pretend you are a musician; if someone came to you aski=
ng you to rewrite your song to better suit their listening needs, how would=
The list has been since =
I remember a place to announce audio works, not only software, and when som=
eone give us links of their work, it happened often that he got critics fro=
m listeners, so he can fix some of his audio work to that individual ears.<=
But anyway the audio creator/producer has the last word=
, like the same on the side of software givers.Th=
is said with all my respect for audio and software creators.