Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: J. Liles <malnourite@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, August 16, 2013 - 5:58 pm

--001a11c365b613e66404e4145711
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Oh my , here I go too...

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, J. Liles wrote:

>

The list has been since I remember a place to announce audio works, not
only software, and when someone give us links of their work, it happened
often that he got critics from listeners, so he can fix some of his audio
work to that individual ears.

But anyway the audio creator/producer has the last word, like the same on
the side of software givers.

This said with all my respect for audio and software creators.

Leo

--001a11c365b613e66404e4145711
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh my , here I go too...On Fri, =
Aug 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, J. Liles <malnourite@gmail.com>=
wrote:

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Egor Sanin <egor.sanin@=
gmail.com
> wrote:

I shall contiribute my voice, too.

On 8/16/13, hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de> wrote:
[SNIP]

way
asn't
re

It is important to note that time is a finite quantity in the physica=
l
reality we are all a part of. =C2=A0This fact limits the amount of "wo=
rk"
any one person can perform.

"Work" can be of different types. =C2=A0The comment above suggest=
s to me
the opinion that the "work" of developers is of higher value beca=
use
to become a developer one has to "move their ass." =C2=A0The prob=
lem with
this statement when talking about audio software is that just having
the software is pointless. =C2=A0The software is made to be used to create<=
br>
music, or at least some sort of audio output. =C2=A0People producing this
output, often called musicians, also need to do a lot of "work." =
=C2=A0To
be a musician, one must also "move their ass."

The "work" of musicians is different, but no less valuable than t=
he
"work" of developers, so let's not get our egos too hot here.=
=C2=A0Just
because one person does not have enough time to perform developer
"work" because most of his time is spent doing musician "wor=
k" (please
research the amount of music that OP has produced with Linux audio
software) is no reason to make him a scapegoat.

And a not on the "goal" of OP's podcasts (I am not speaking f=
or him,
rather simply providing my interpretation): a piece of criticism is
usually created to generate discussion. =C2=A0In the most basic form, this<=
br>
is enough of a reason to do something.
An interesting point. As a=
though experiment: pretend you are a musician; if someone came to you aski=
ng you to rewrite your song to better suit their listening needs, how would=
you respond?
The list has been since =
I remember a place to announce audio works, not only software, and when som=
eone give us links of their work, it happened often that he got critics fro=
m listeners, so he can fix some of his audio work to that individual ears.<=
/div>
But anyway the audio creator/producer has the last word=
, like the same on the side of software givers.Th=
is said with all my respect for audio and software creators.
Leo

--001a11c365b613e66404e4145711--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Louigi Verona, (Thu Aug 15, 11:23 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Leonardo Palomares, (Fri Aug 16, 5:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Aug 17, 10:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Aug 18, 11:25 am)
Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast. episode003: commenting replies, Harry van Haaren, (Thu Aug 15, 11:42 am)