Re: [LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 - 1:04 pm

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 08:07:51AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

> yes, absolutely. the only reason that -X raw and -X seq have not been

This made me have a look at the sources.

Up to ten minutes ago I was believing that a2jmidid used timestamps etc.
to reduce jitter, and that this made it preferable over Jack's -X.

But apparently it doesn't, all events in the same Jack period are
just bunched together. There's even a comment in the source code:

/* -FIX- this should have the frame time of the event, instead of '0': */

So what is the advantage ?

Ciao,

--
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack, Kevin Utter, (Fri Jul 26, 4:40 am)
Re: [LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack, Paul Davis, (Fri Jul 26, 12:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Jul 26, 1:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack, Paul Davis, (Fri Jul 26, 1:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Jul 26, 2:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] MIDI Port names in Jack, Julien Claassen, (Fri Jul 26, 6:30 am)