Re: [LAU] maximum input level, or normalization and dc offset correction?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ricardus Vincente <wizardofgosz@...>
Cc: Linux Audio User <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, July 12, 2013 - 6:37 pm

--001a11c3ed34c533ea04e154cb25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Ricardus Vincente
wrote:

some such thing.

[Side note on gremlins]
Inter sample peaks: neither peak represents the highest value of the wave:
the peak exists between the samples. This is a mathematically proven
phenomena. The distance to keep from 0dB FS depends on the signal (due to
the inter-sample peaks depending on the signal).

I tend to stay away 3dB from 0dBFS, I think that suffices... -Harry

--001a11c3ed34c533ea04e154cb25
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Ricardus Vincente <wizardofgosz@gmail.com> wrote=
:> Some people believe in this new gremlim called inter-sample disto=
rtion or some such thing.
[Side note on gremlins]Inter sample peaks: neither peak represents =
the highest value of the wave: the peak exists between the samples. This is=
a mathematically proven phenomena. The distance to keep from 0dB FS depend=
s on the signal (due to the inter-sample peaks depending on the signal).
I tend to stay away 3dB from 0dBFS, I think that suffices... -Harry

--001a11c3ed34c533ea04e154cb25--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] maximum input level, or normalization and dc offse..., Ricardus Vincente, (Fri Jul 12, 6:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] maximum input level, or normalization and dc offse..., Harry van Haaren, (Fri Jul 12, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] maximum input level, or normalization and dc offse..., Ricardus Vincente, (Fri Jul 12, 8:20 pm)