[LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <Linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, June 8, 2013 - 7:49 pm

--e89a8ff1cf121d04f104dea9d824
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I am struggling to get usable realtime performance <512 latency on my
Ubuntu Studio "low latency" kernels 3.8... The 3.5 kernel in contrast works
fine. I put a bugreport in with Ubuntu, but it seems like no-one else is
reporting the same problem. Makes me wonder if I am doing something wrong.
Is there anything additional I should be trying, or is this a known problem
that is being worked on by the kernel devs?

James

--e89a8ff1cf121d04f104dea9d824
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am struggling to get usable realtime performance <512 latency on my Ub=
untu Studio "low latency" kernels 3.8... The 3.5 kernel in contra=
st works fine. I put a bugreport in with Ubuntu, but it seems like no-one e=
lse is reporting the same problem. Makes me wonder if I am doing something =
wrong. Is there anything additional I should be trying, or is this a known =
problem that is being worked on by the kernel devs?
James

--e89a8ff1cf121d04f104dea9d824--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, James Stone, (Sat Jun 8, 7:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, Clemens Ladisch, (Sun Jun 9, 9:04 am)
Re: [LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, James Stone, (Thu Jun 27, 11:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Jun 28, 5:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Jun 28, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, James Stone, (Fri Jun 28, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] 3.8 vs. 3.5 for realtime USB performance, James Stone, (Sun Jun 9, 10:25 am)