Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 - 10:46 pm

Am 05.04.2013 03:10, schrieb Ralf Mardorf:

This may be true in 99.9 out of 100 minutes of recording until that
statistically unlikely event happens, that some operation is keen to
load a lib from the disk while another important operation wants to load
another 20 seconds 96/32 audio data for 32 tracks from the very same disk.

While I agree, that Linux in pretty good in using RAM for caching and we
live in times where a complete 4-min track on 20+ tracks fits into a
RAM-disk I would not take chances.

I have a SSD for all the software and the OS and a conventional drive
for the audio/video data plus 8Gig RAM and so I do not need to even
think about, whether bad side-effects could occure or not. Not that
expensive and good for my nerves... ;-)

> It's IMO useful to separate

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Grekim Jennings, (Thu Apr 4, 10:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Len Ovens, (Thu Apr 4, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Egor Sanin, (Thu Apr 11, 5:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Apr 12, 2:58 am)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Brett McCoy, (Thu Apr 4, 10:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Apr 5, 1:10 am)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Hartmut Noack, (Tue Apr 9, 10:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Apr 9, 11:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work, Moshe Werner, (Mon Apr 8, 8:09 am)