Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robin Gareus <robin@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 - 9:20 pm

On Tue, April 9, 2013 6:45 am, Robin Gareus wrote:

That twigs something in my memory... One of the mail list archives I think.

Ah, sounds good. I want to try using it for "broadcast remote
contribution", I think they call it, to replace the SIP
client->pulse->jack (and back) chain. I am finding that my computer is not
powerful enough to handle the extra (de)code as well as the pulse
overhead. There do not seem to be any SIP clients that deal directly with
jackd.

Anyway, I can try it out with CELT till the new version shows up. The cpu
load should be similar.

--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Sun Apr 7, 11:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Peder Hedlund, (Tue Apr 9, 6:52 am)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Tue Apr 9, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Robin Gareus, (Tue Apr 9, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Tue Apr 9, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Paul Davis, (Sun Apr 7, 11:47 pm)