Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <len@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 - 1:45 pm

On 04/09/2013 03:37 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
[..]

You do need a version of libopus that was configured/compiled with
--enable-custom-modes

This has been discussed in great length on #opus and #jack and jack-dev

The bottom line was that distributions are not recommended to ship
libopus with this mode enabled - and packagers of jackd are to take care
of it. Adi volunteered to take care of this for the deb package.

best,
robin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Sun Apr 7, 11:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Peder Hedlund, (Tue Apr 9, 6:52 am)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Tue Apr 9, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Robin Gareus, (Tue Apr 9, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Tue Apr 9, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Paul Davis, (Sun Apr 7, 11:47 pm)