Re: [LAU] Somebody here using: Phasex configuration

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 7, 2013 - 11:58 pm

On 08/04/13 01:26, Len Ovens wrote:

It definitely has some unique features: the delays are fun, for
instance, because they can be modulated by LFOs, and it's also one of
the few softsynths I know of (the only one I can think of off-hand for
Linux, in fact) that can take audio input and run it through its
filter/envelopes, much like many hardware synths can. That opens up some
interesting possibilities.

It takes a lot to get me to use an external JACK softsynth these days,
though -- I rarely even use Hydrogen any more. If it's not a plugin
(preferably LV2, though native VST will do in a pinch), I'm pretty
unlikely to use it, unless it's the only option available to get the
result I'm after.

Thanks
Leigh

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Phasex configuration, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Apr 7, 2:16 am)
[LAU] Somebody here using: Phasex configuration, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Apr 7, 11:49 am)
Re: [LAU] Somebody here using: Phasex configuration, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Apr 7, 7:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] Somebody here using: Phasex configuration, Leigh Dyer, (Sun Apr 7, 11:58 pm)