Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <len@...>
Cc: linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 7, 2013 - 11:47 pm

--089e0160a4060d43b004d9cdf0e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Len Ovens wrote:

> My jackdbus2 says it is 1.9.9.5. (taken from ~/.log/jack/jackdbus.log)

celt is dead.

opus is its replacement.

netjack2 has been modified to support opus. netjack1 has not.

--089e0160a4060d43b004d9cdf0e6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Len Oven=
s <len@ovenwerks.net> wrote:
My jackdbus2 says it is 1.9.9.5. (taken from ~/.log/jack/jackdbus.log)

The release notes say "- Add opus support to NetJack2."

jack_control ip netadapter Shows:
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 celt: Set CELT encoding and number of kBits=
per channel
(sint:notset:-1:-1)

Am I mistaken in my understanding that the jacknet2 backend is a part of
jackd? Or does setting "celt" actually now set opus? (the jackd m=
anpage
also uses the word celt)celt is dead.opus=
is its replacement. netjack2 has been modified to support opus. ne=
tjack1 has not.

--089e0160a4060d43b004d9cdf0e6--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Sun Apr 7, 11:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Peder Hedlund, (Tue Apr 9, 6:52 am)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Tue Apr 9, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Robin Gareus, (Tue Apr 9, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Len Ovens, (Tue Apr 9, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] netjack2 CELT or opus?, Paul Davis, (Sun Apr 7, 11:47 pm)