Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: LAU <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, April 14, 2013 - 9:05 am

[Fons Adriaensen]

The problem with the additive approach is that it doesn't easily model
nonlinearities and the repeated excitation of an already oscillating
instrument properly. It's also hard to correctly emulate the
behaviour of continuously varying excitation points. I suppose you
could go a long way with precomputed data but the multiple dimensions
of the parameter space, with time being one, might make this a bit
cumbersome.

>> http://community.ardour.org/files/dang1.ogg

I'm not qualified to judge the realism but to me this snippet sounds
very good in an absolute way.

Tim
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Kaspar Bumke, (Sat Apr 13, 1:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Paul Davis, (Sat Apr 13, 7:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Florian Paul Schmidt, (Sat Apr 13, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Kaspar Bumke, (Mon Apr 15, 8:03 am)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, rosea.grammostola, (Sat Apr 13, 10:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, R. Mattes, (Sat Apr 13, 9:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Apr 13, 9:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Paul Davis, (Sat Apr 13, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Apr 13, 10:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Tim Goetze, (Sun Apr 14, 9:05 am)
Re: [LAU] Hang Drum SFZ, Folderol, (Sat Apr 13, 9:02 pm)