Re: [LAU] Glitch 2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Atte <atte@...>
Cc: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, April 12, 2013 - 10:30 am

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010806080302090000020301
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 12.04.2013 12:02, schrieb Atte:

Sorry, No, I haven't try it, nor do I plan to do it, it's simply not my
kind of tool.
Just, when you ask for be quiet about issues between close versus open
software, I can't resist to make a joke, because at this point there
wasn't any sign that the discussion will go in that direction.
The opposite was the case, people try to find solutions to solve the
issue with this plug.
And they try first to found the error by there own implementation!!

(so, yes, asking for be patient makes me feel a bit relegated, at this
point), . . .;-)

--------------010806080302090000020301
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 12.04.2013 12:02, schrieb Atte:
On
04/12/2013 10:57 AM, hermann meyer wrote:

So you will encourage people to "have no
fun" ? :-P

That's one way to look at it :-)

What do *you* think about this? Did I do or write anything wrong?
Have *you* got any ideas how we deal with glitch2 problems?

Sorry, No, I haven't try it, nor do I plan to do it, it's simply not
my kind of tool.
Just, when you ask for be quiet about issues between close versus
open software, I can't resist to make a joke, because at this point
there wasn't any sign that the discussion will go in that direction.

The opposite was the case, people try to find solutions to solve the
issue with this plug.
And they try first to found the error by there own implementation!!

(so, yes, asking for be patient makes me feel a bit
relegated, at this point), . . . ;-)  

--------------010806080302090000020301--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Glitch 2, Dave Phillips, (Wed Apr 10, 11:37 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 10, 12:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Paul Davis, (Wed Apr 10, 12:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Tim E. Real, (Thu Apr 11, 12:05 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Atte, (Fri Apr 12, 6:42 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Tim E. Real, (Fri Apr 12, 11:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Paul Davis, (Sat Apr 13, 12:15 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Dan MacDonald, (Sat Apr 13, 7:34 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, taktik, (Mon Apr 15, 5:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Tim E. Real, (Mon Apr 15, 6:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, taktik, (Thu Apr 18, 4:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Rui Nuno Capela, (Mon Apr 15, 5:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, taktik, (Mon Apr 15, 6:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Louigi Verona, (Mon Apr 15, 6:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Paul Davis, (Mon Apr 15, 6:05 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Paul Davis, (Mon Apr 15, 5:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Johannes Kroll, (Fri Apr 12, 10:28 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Atte, (Fri Apr 12, 12:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Kieran Foster, (Fri Apr 12, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, rosea.grammostola, (Fri Apr 12, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Louigi Verona, (Fri Apr 12, 7:00 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Atte, (Fri Apr 12, 7:11 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, hermann meyer, (Fri Apr 12, 8:58 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Atte, (Fri Apr 12, 10:02 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, hermann meyer, (Fri Apr 12, 10:30 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Louigi Verona, (Fri Apr 12, 10:32 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, hermann meyer, (Fri Apr 12, 11:02 am)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Louigi Verona, (Wed Apr 10, 12:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Apr 10, 4:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Rui Nuno Capela, (Thu Apr 11, 6:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Joe Hartley, (Thu Apr 11, 6:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Johannes Kroll, (Wed Apr 10, 4:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] Glitch 2, Louigi Verona, (Wed Apr 10, 11:40 am)