Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: James Stone <jamesmstone@...>
Cc: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, February 8, 2013 - 7:15 pm

On 02/08/13 01:10, James Stone wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Brent Busby wrote:

Just listen through your interface, and compare to what you hear
directly from a mixer (or some similar method). If it sounds much
darker through the interface at 44.1kHz, that samplerate may have been
an afterthought to the creators.

--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ James Franck Institute + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ Materials Research Ctr + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 7, 10:17 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 7, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Len Ovens, (Thu Feb 7, 4:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 7, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Len Ovens, (Thu Feb 7, 5:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Brent Busby, (Fri Feb 8, 1:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Fri Feb 8, 7:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Brent Busby, (Fri Feb 8, 7:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Len Ovens, (Fri Feb 8, 2:05 pm)