Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: James Stone <jamesmstone@...>
Cc: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2013 - 4:48 pm

On Thu, February 7, 2013 2:17 am, James Stone wrote:

48k seems to be the standard the ADCs are built for. The non-pro audio
cards (AC97 and HDA) are designed around 48k. In fact AC97 codecs sample
at 48K and resample down to 44.1k sometimes badly (SB Live!). Go back a
month in this list a month or so for more reasons why 44.1k is less than
good for recording.

--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 7, 10:17 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 7, 10:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Len Ovens, (Thu Feb 7, 4:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 7, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Len Ovens, (Thu Feb 7, 5:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Brent Busby, (Fri Feb 8, 1:06 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, James Stone, (Fri Feb 8, 7:10 am)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Brent Busby, (Fri Feb 8, 7:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?, Len Ovens, (Fri Feb 8, 2:05 pm)