linuxaudio.org

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:56 AM, J. Liles wrote:
> The biggest problem is that there are more people talking than there are

quoted text
> people doing. There are a 100 people to tell you this or that UI is shit,

> but absolutely no-one to step up and do something about it.

That would be an exaggeration, although I see where you are coming from.
Now, this:
> With very few exceptions, LAD software is not

quoted text
> written for 'the users', it is written for the needs of the developers and

> gifted to the community without warranty.

kinda contradicts this:
> Nobody said the goal of Linux Audio was to replace Non-Linux

quoted text
> Audio. The goal of Linux Audio is simply to provide free-software

> alternatives for people who give a shit (this group consists mostly of the

> LAD developers themselves).

And then...
> Yes, the many standards/approches can be

quoted text
> annoying.. But since when is diversity a bad thing?

Since dawn of times, J.
Creating a complex product requires certain expertise. Acquiring that

expertise is a matter of time and devotion, hence the amount of people

having it is rather small. Divided, they cannot make usable software

fast enough.
> And the problem of there being no such thing as an open source graphic

quoted text
> designer or UX expert applies to all free-software, not just LAD.

I really love how bravely you make use of hyperbole :) I'm not sure if

you ever stumbled upon 100% lack of imagination, but I assure you that

there will be people who will understand you literally. And that would

be quite a disaster.
Alexandre Prokoudine

http://libregraphicsworld.org

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user