linuxaudio.org

On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 17:24 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:

quoted text
> > dwm has both idiosyncrasies and a learning curve, but so too do most

> > "expert" pieces of software. vim and emacs are the canonical examples,

>

> I never did get anywhere with those two. Ed and Vi mostly, though I think

> I have forgotten most of it. I found joe and used it ever after... it's

> still my main CLI text ed.

I use vi(m), if nothing else should be available. Should I make yet

another joke about emacs ;)? When searching for a MUA I once chose

"wanderlust", because I like the name. It's a mail client for emacs. To

like the name of an application isn't enough to use it forever.
I preferred mcedit, but during setting up a new Arch install I used

nano, because regarding to a font and mcedit's default colors the fonts

are more readable.
Even for the GUI I've given up gedit, while I still install it. From

FreeBSD I wanted to edit a Linux, so I started "gksu gedit", but I got

no write access, then I became root and used another editor and I could

edit Linux. I tend to drop applications that can't be started by root,

but only when running "gksu" and co.
For nano I'm missing highlighting, but I already read that it is

possible to get it for nano too.
Half-OT: I don't get the Xfce4 issues others and I get for Ubuntu

Quantal, for my Arch Linux install.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user