Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013 - 12:37 am

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:47:09 +0100
William Light wrote:

> > So you have to recompile every time you want to tweak settings?

C as the config language? I think we just reached Nerdvana! If I weren't
so happy with Fluxbox, I'd be tempted to try this out. I just don't have
the time for that sort of a geexpedition now, though.

I like fluxbox because it lets me recreate the old Sun OLVWM environment
I used for years, with a few modifications, and enough recognition of the
rest of the Linux world to get along with any type of application I've tried,
Gnome, KDE, Motif - it'll do the right thing.

> i wasn't really expecting a backlash, maybe just a chuckle or two.

You definitely got one here!

> for the record, i use renoise in dwm (in a floating workspace) and it's

I'm coming in late to this, but at one point it looked like "tiling" got
conflated to virtual desktops, at least as I plowed through my email.
Ralf seemed to be against VDs (hey! In another context, so am I!), but I
think he's a purist looking to keep things as lean as possible. I like that,
and think that saving resources is overlooked in these days of gigs of RAM
and multiple cores running in the GHz range.

When I was a college freshman back in the stone knives and bearskin days,
I had an assignment to write a program in Pascal on a DEC TOPS-20 to perform
a simple task, and it had to compile to be >= n bytes in size. It wasn't
hard to get it to n-2 bytes, but those last two were tough. The trick was
that we had to use one type of loop rather than the obvious(*) which saved
the two bytes in the compiler.

I don't think programmers have worried about that type of optimization in
years, except perhaps embedded system folks, and even there I don't know if
two bytes would matter to a soul.

My favorite optimization story ever is the story of Mel Kaye.
http://catb.org/jargon/html/story-of-mel.html

(*) using an until rather than a while, or some such - the details are lost
to time, at least until the Doctor comes round.

--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Len Ovens, (Wed Feb 20, 7:37 am)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Feb 20, 5:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Feb 20, 7:45 am)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Feb 20, 5:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, William Light, (Wed Feb 20, 12:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Feb 20, 1:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, William Light, (Thu Feb 21, 11:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 22, 8:48 am)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Dave Phillips, (Fri Feb 22, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 22, 1:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Feb 23, 12:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 22, 1:23 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Joe Hartley, (Fri Feb 22, 12:37 am)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 20, 1:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, (Fri Feb 22, 1:06 am)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Feb 20, 2:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 20, 2:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Feb 20, 2:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] light weight, full featured desktop for audio, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 20, 3:09 pm)