linuxaudio.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01CE0FCE.A4D00E42

Content-Type: text/plain;

	charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Don=92t get me wrong, there=92s nothing bad with playing chess, but =

it=92s just a game and playing chess doesn=92t give super cow powers.

Being active  does train our creativity, brains and muscles.  =

Questionable if boxing or playing chess, is the more active ?exertion.
There=92s also nothing bad with inland water fishing.  Also called a =

sport, but a sport with being less active.
The rule is: =93?You snooze, you lose.=94 It=92s not important what we =

like to do,  it=92s important that we do something.
Listening to music A isn=92t better, than listening to music B.  Doing X =

isn=92t better than doing Y.  Where do all this claims come from?
Some people playing chess are creative others aren=92t, it has less to =

do with playing chess.
-----Original Message-----

From: linux-audio-user-bounces@lists.linuxaudio.org on behalf of Alf =

Haakon Lund

Sent: Wed 2/20/2013 21:02

To: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

Subject: Re: [LAU] The Psychology of Music

=20

On 20. feb. 2013 12:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:12:13 +0100, david

> wrote:

>> Ah, so IBM's chess-playing whiz computer is also an artist now?

>

> And it aways was called a "sport" :D. And often it's claimed that all

>  highly gifted people play chess :D.

>

> Perhaps done by people who like to play chess and who wish to be

> artists, wish to be sportsman and wish to be highly gifted ;).

Since I love playing chess I should probably feel insulted, but as

the description kinda suits me, well, who am I to complain?
------_=_NextPart_001_01CE0FCE.A4D00E42

Content-Type: text/html;

	charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
RE: [LAU] The Psychology of Music
Don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing bad with =

playing chess, but it’s just a game and playing chess doesn’t =

give super cow powers.

Being active  does train our creativity, brains and muscles.  =

Questionable if boxing or playing chess, is the more active =

exertion.
There’s also nothing bad with inland water fishing.  Also =

called a sport, but a sport with being less active.
The rule is: “You snooze, you lose.” It’s not =

important what we like to do,  it’s important that we do =

something.
Listening to music A isn’t better, than listening to music B.  =

Doing X isn’t better than doing Y.  Where do all this claims =

come from?
Some people playing chess are creative others aren’t, it has less =

to do with playing chess.
-----Original Message-----

From: linux-audio-user-bounces@lists.linuxaudio.org on behalf of Alf =

Haakon Lund

Sent: Wed 2/20/2013 21:02

To: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

Subject: Re: [LAU] The Psychology of Music
On 20. feb. 2013 12:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:12:13 +0100, david =

<gnome@hawaii.rr.com>

quoted text
> wrote:

>> Ah, so IBM's chess-playing whiz computer is also an artist =

now?

quoted text
>

> And it aways was called a "sport" :D. And often it's =

claimed that all

quoted text
>  highly gifted people play chess :D.

>

> Perhaps done by people who like to play chess and who wish to =

be

quoted text
> artists, wish to be sportsman and wish to be highly gifted ;).

Since I love playing chess I should probably feel insulted, but as

the description kinda suits me, well, who am I to complain?
------_=_NextPart_001_01CE0FCE.A4D00E42--