linuxaudio.org

2013/2/20 Ralf Mardorf :

quoted text
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:13:11 +0100, Raffaele Morelli

>  wrote:

>>

>> 2013/2/20 Ralf Mardorf :

>>>

>>> Perhaps there are, maybe there aren't, but tiled WMs anyway are useless

>>> for

>>> a serious audio production GUI workflow, you even don't need a WM, simply

>>> use X only, if you like to break a sane workflow.

>>

>> that's your questionable opinion with some garbage

>> first of all tiled WMs (like awesome) can be used in serious audio

>> production as you can/cannot use tiling

>> the sane workflow is the one which fits to the user

>

>

> I don't want to discuss this nonsense, but I also have written, that for a

> minority such WMs might be ok, so don't skew my words. You can't seriously

> belief, that such WMs will be good for _common_ workflow in _averaged_ audio

> studios.

We always read you neverending replies so I guess you can survive to

this quite easily :-)

Yes I seriously belive that Awesome is really usable in a studio.
-r
--

L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata

all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti,

alla protesta violenta e viscerale. (V. Evangelisti)

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user