linuxaudio.org

[michael noble]

quoted text
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Tim Goetze  wrote:

>

>> If you're not doing anything funky (and you'd have to go out of your

>> way to)

>>

>

>My understanding is that the latency measure displayed by JACK is for one

>cycle of the entire JACK graph (or something like that). That means apps in

>a standard linear signal chain won't add extra latency. It also means you

>don't have to be that funky to add extra latency - just put a loop anywhere

>in your signal chain (eg. a send from Ardour to an external jack app and

>back into Ardour). The audio won't be processed by the client at the loop

>point until the next execution cycle, effectively adding a full cycle of

>latency at that point in the signal chain.

>

>At least, that's how I think it was patiently explained to me a while back.

It's true, and I consider a processing graph containing a loop funky.

It seems our funkiness scales are calibrated to different references.

:)
Tim

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user