Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 - 1:55 am

On 02/18/2013 01:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

I understand another argument against making an RT kernel the default
stock one is that a runaway RT process could produce an internal
denial-of-service condition. IIRC, the thought was that people who
actually needed an RT kernel knew about the risk and would accept it,
while ordinary people who don't need RT don't have to encounter it.

Vague recollection from something read somewhere, I think it was a
discussion list archive I found on the web somewhere.

--
David
gnome@hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://clanjones.org/david/
http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel, Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 18, 11:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel, david, (Tue Feb 19, 1:55 am)
Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel, Federico Bruni, (Mon Feb 18, 8:43 pm)