[LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: <jonetsu@...>
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, February 18, 2013 - 8:36 pm

If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why
isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in
Linux Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not
having a lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the
Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do
they ?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel, , (Mon Feb 18, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel, Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 18, 11:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel, Federico Bruni, (Mon Feb 18, 8:43 pm)