Re: [LAU] Some new Bach

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Julien Claassen <julien@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, February 16, 2013 - 4:24 pm

--e89a8f3b9ff5c386c904d5d9edbb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:

> Hello!

Google for Mozart effect and you will find things like
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281386/
Also stuff trying to debunk stuff like the above!

About the hard metal (if thats what its called) version of Beethoven's
moonlight,
Ive collected some preliminary thoughts on my blog:
http://blog.languager.org/2011/02/cs-education-is-fat-and-weak-3.html

Note its part of a series on CS education; music is only incidental.
Still if any of you have thoughts/suggestions, Id like to hear

Rusi

--e89a8f3b9ff5c386c904d5d9edbb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Julien =
Claassen <julien@mail.upb.de> wrote:

Hello!
=A0 I once heard, that the changes between loud and quiet sections in Mozar=
t's music generally correspond to some rhythm in brain wave patterns. t=
he timing is supposed to be right. But that was years and years ago, so I c=
ouldn't quote you an article. but I'm almost sure it was in connect=
ion with one of those experiments, where they took three groups, folding pa=
per, cutting shapes into it and then have them imagine, what the final resu=
lt would look like. I think they were tested on Mozart, Philip Glas and no =
music. Coming to the conclusion, that the Mozart group had the best results=
. I can't remember, how the remaining two groups were ranked. - Oh yes,=
they were all started together with no music, so that there was a way to c=
ompare them.

Google for Mozart effect and you w=
ill find things likehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM=
C1281386/

Also stuff trying to debunk stuff like the above!About the hard met=
al (if thats what its called) version of Beethoven's moonlight,Ive =
collected some preliminary thoughts on my blog:http://blog.langu=
ager.org/2011/02/cs-education-is-fat-and-weak-3.html

Note its part of a series on CS education; music is only incidental.Still if any of you have thoughts/suggestions, Id like to hearRusi=

--e89a8f3b9ff5c386c904d5d9edbb--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Tue Feb 12, 10:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Rustom Mody, (Thu Feb 14, 12:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Thu Feb 14, 1:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 1:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 1:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Chris Bannister, (Sat Feb 16, 12:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Sat Feb 16, 12:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Rustom Mody, (Sat Feb 16, 4:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Lorenzo Sutton, (Thu Feb 14, 3:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 14, 3:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 4:45 pm)
[LAU] OT: do you like this kind of looseness?, drew Roberts, (Thu Feb 14, 6:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: do you like this kind of looseness?, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: do you like this kind of looseness?, drew Roberts, (Fri Feb 15, 2:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Rustom Mody, (Thu Feb 14, 5:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Tim Goetze, (Thu Feb 14, 9:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Thu Feb 14, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 14, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Lorenzo Sutton, (Fri Feb 15, 9:19 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 2:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 2:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Feb 14, 9:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 3:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 3:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 3:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 4:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 3:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 3:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 3:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 4:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Thu Feb 14, 2:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Wed Feb 13, 11:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Apr 10, 2:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Wed Apr 10, 4:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Daniel Worth, (Wed Feb 13, 12:55 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Wed Feb 13, 8:09 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Al Thompson, (Wed Feb 13, 4:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 6:23 pm)