Re: [LAU] Sample rates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bob van der Poel <bob@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 - 8:04 pm

On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:30:15 +0100, Bob van der Poel
wrote:

Yes, equal settings for frames/periode and periods/buffer will result in a
lower latency at a higher sample rate.

>> Higher sample rate = more data at equal bit depth.

You should prefer 48 KHz, that it does take more data shouldn't matter.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 3:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Clemens Ladisch, (Fri Feb 15, 7:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Len Ovens, (Fri Feb 15, 9:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 4:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 8:04 pm)