Re: [LAU] Sample rates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 - 5:32 pm

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:

Is this saying that a higher freq will result in lower latency? Guess
that makes sense since higher freq contains more data.

> Higher sample rate = more data at equal bit depth.

Guess there really is no reason not to use 48K then.

Thanks.

--
**** Listen to my CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars ****
Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA **
EMAIL: bob@mellowood.ca
WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 3:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Clemens Ladisch, (Fri Feb 15, 7:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Len Ovens, (Fri Feb 15, 9:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 4:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 8:04 pm)