Re: [LAU] Sample rates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 - 4:04 am

On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 20:32 -0700, Bob van der Poel wrote:

All audio devices I know automatically are set to the sample rate set by
alsa, 'jackd -d alsa --help'.

No, the latency will differ for different sample rates:

512 samples / 44.1 kHz = 11.609977324 ms
11.609977324 * 2 = 23.219954649 ms ≈ 23.2 ms

512 samples / 48.0 kHz = 10.666666667 ms
10.666666667 * 2 = 21.333333334 ms ≈ 21.3 ms

Higher sample rate = more data at equal bit depth.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 3:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Clemens Ladisch, (Fri Feb 15, 7:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Len Ovens, (Fri Feb 15, 9:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 4:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 8:04 pm)