[LAU] Sample rates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bob van der Poel <bob@...>
To: linux-audio-user <Linux-audio-user@...>
Subject: [LAU] Sample rates
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 - 3:33 am

I'm still exploring my new USB interface (Presonus audiobox usb). In

the manual it says that it has a bit depth of 24 and internal

frequency selectors for 44.1 and 48.


Now, if I have an app like audacity set to 48K does it (or jack?) send

a message to the box to enable 48 (or 44.1)? If that is the case, I

assume that using 44.1 or 48 should have the identical latency issues?

48K should send a bit more data back to the computer?


I did another test recording this evening. No xruns. I think that

fixing ulimit so that jack can allocate memory fixed the problem.


--

**** Listen to my CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars ****

Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA **

EMAIL: bob@mellowood.ca

WWW:   http://www.mellowood.ca

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 3:33 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Clemens Ladisch, (Fri Feb 15, 7:53 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Len Ovens, (Fri Feb 15, 9:59 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 4:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Bob van der Poel, (Fri Feb 15, 5:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Sample rates, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Feb 15, 8:04 pm)