Re: [LAU] Some new Bach

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, February 14, 2013 - 3:39 pm

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050308030403040004080006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/14/2013 10:31 AM, Paul Davis wrote:

Since "harmonious" is a loaded term - are we referring to a vertical
sonority or a horizontal progression - I'll venture a "Why not ?". After
a course in Modus Novus it's surprising what sounds harmonious. :)

But then I'm a great lover of Schoenberg and his disciples, so my
definition of "harmonious" is probably rather suspect.

Best,

dp

--------------050308030403040004080006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/14/2013 10:31 AM, Paul Davis
wrote:

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Dave
Phillips <dlphillips@woh.rr.com>
wrote:

Picturesque, but not
historically accurate, I'm sure you know. More like, where
melody and melody collided. :)

if line 1 and line 2 do not intersect in a harmonious way, is
it still counterpoint? would anyone call it that?

Since "harmonious" is a loaded term - are we referring to a vertical
sonority or a horizontal progression - I'll venture a "Why not ?".
After a course in Modus Novus it's surprising what sounds
harmonious. :)

But then I'm a great lover of Schoenberg and his disciples, so my
definition of "harmonious" is probably rather suspect.

Best,

dp

--------------050308030403040004080006--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Tue Feb 12, 10:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Rustom Mody, (Thu Feb 14, 12:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Thu Feb 14, 1:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 1:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 1:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Chris Bannister, (Sat Feb 16, 12:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Sat Feb 16, 12:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Rustom Mody, (Sat Feb 16, 4:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Lorenzo Sutton, (Thu Feb 14, 3:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 14, 3:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 4:45 pm)
[LAU] OT: do you like this kind of looseness?, drew Roberts, (Thu Feb 14, 6:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: do you like this kind of looseness?, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] OT: do you like this kind of looseness?, drew Roberts, (Fri Feb 15, 2:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Rustom Mody, (Thu Feb 14, 5:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Tim Goetze, (Thu Feb 14, 9:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Thu Feb 14, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 14, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Lorenzo Sutton, (Fri Feb 15, 9:19 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 2:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 2:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Feb 14, 9:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 3:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 3:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 3:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 4:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 14, 3:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 3:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Dave Phillips, (Thu Feb 14, 3:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Thu Feb 14, 4:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Thu Feb 14, 2:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Folderol, (Wed Feb 13, 11:41 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Carlos sanchiavedraz, (Wed Apr 10, 2:52 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Wed Apr 10, 4:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Daniel Worth, (Wed Feb 13, 12:55 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Julien Claassen, (Wed Feb 13, 8:09 am)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Al Thompson, (Wed Feb 13, 4:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] Some new Bach, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 6:23 pm)