Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Gene Heskett <gheskett@...>, <gnome@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, February 14, 2013 - 9:38 am

--14dae934123bdb8b6404d5ac058d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

> On Thursday 14 February 2013 04:09:44 Rustom Mody did opine:

Alien is the option I first used when I got the printer years ago and it
worked then
Thereafter canon started supplying debs. So far so good in the 32-bit world.

Come the 64-bit era and I find there are only 32 bit debs.
So alien was the first option I tried. It did not work.
The two other options are
- compile from source
- use 32 bit deb with ia32

The first did not go through. I have to try harder I guess
The second Ive not yet tried

--14dae934123bdb8b6404d5ac058d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Gene He=
skett <gheskett@wdtv.com> wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013 04:09:44 Rustom Mody did opine:

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:32 AM, david <gnome@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:

the
trying to

> > difficulties with either one.

"alien" should fix that.
Alien is the option I first used when I got the prin=
ter years ago and it worked thenThereafter canon started supplying debs=
. So far so good in the 32-bit world.Come the 64-bit era and I find=
there are only 32 bit debs.
So alien was the first option I tried. It did not work.The two other op=
tions are- compile from source- use 32 bit deb with ia32The=
first did not go through. I have to try harder I guessThe second Ive n=
ot yet tried

--14dae934123bdb8b6404d5ac058d--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, James Stone, (Tue Feb 5, 9:29 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, david, (Tue Feb 5, 7:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Rustom Mody, (Thu Feb 14, 7:37 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Jonathan E. Brickman, (Thu Feb 14, 9:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Thomas Vecchione, (Thu Feb 14, 2:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, david, (Thu Feb 14, 9:15 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, James Stone, (Thu Feb 14, 10:10 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Gene Heskett, (Thu Feb 14, 9:10 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 10:58 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Gene Heskett, (Thu Feb 14, 3:35 pm)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Rustom Mody, (Thu Feb 14, 9:38 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Luigino Bracci, (Tue Feb 5, 9:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, david, (Wed Feb 6, 9:39 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Charles Z Henry, (Tue Feb 5, 7:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, david, (Wed Feb 6, 9:45 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Dan MacDonald, (Tue Feb 5, 10:46 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, Arve Barsnes, (Tue Feb 5, 9:45 am)
Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?, James Stone, (Tue Feb 5, 10:30 am)