Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Al Thompson <althompson58@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 - 9:35 am

--14dae934088dcb502504d597dd4b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

True. You are not forcing anyone. However, when you release
something into the public, copyright sort of makes everyone agree
to the contract with you even if they don't want it.
How you can hear something or see something even if you did not
aim to do that, I listed in my response to Michael above.

Kinsella has a whole chapter about copyright as a contract.

To make clear, I am NOT against contracts. If you give me a book
under a contract, it is morally correct to abide by the contract.
Question is, can this duplicate a sort of copyright regime? Kinsella
argues that no. I argue the same. It is practically almost impossible.
One person violates the contract and the closed club of
contract agreements is compromised.

--14dae934088dcb502504d597dd4b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

True. You are not forcing anyone. However, when you releasesomething in=
to the public, copyright sort of makes everyone agreeto the contract wi=
th you even if they don't want it.How you can hear something or see=
something even if you did not
aim to do that, I listed in my response to Michael above.Kinsella h=
as a whole chapter about copyright as a contract.To make clear, I a=
m NOT against contracts. If you give me a bookunder a contract, it is m=
orally correct to abide by the contract.
Question is, can this duplicate a sort of copyright regime? Kinsellaarg=
ues that no. I argue the same. It is practically almost impossible.One =
person violates the contract and the closed club ofcontract agreements =
is compromised.

--14dae934088dcb502504d597dd4b--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, James Harkins, (Wed Feb 13, 2:15 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 6:42 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 6:45 am)
[LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 3:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, Paul Davis, (Wed Feb 13, 3:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 4:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, Paul Davis, (Wed Feb 13, 4:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 5:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 9:35 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, michael noble, (Wed Feb 13, 7:45 am)
[LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, michael noble, (Wed Feb 13, 8:57 am)
[LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 3:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 9:07 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 6:49 am)