Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 - 6:49 am

--14dae9340e11b99ecb04d59589cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

"The flaw in your example is "you TOOK someone's piece of marble." You
may have added value to the marble FOR THE OWNER, if he likes your
statue. Or, you may have REDUCED it's value to the owner, if he
intended to use the marble for a counter top. The point being, that you
cannot base "increased value" arguments when you base your premise on
STEALING the item in the first place."

This is not a flaw - this is the main point of the example.
It shows that property right is not given by creation. The fact that
it was *you* who wrote the book does not give you any property rights
over the copy of the book someone else bought. He now owns it. The
fact that you wrote the story does not now give you any property right in
it.

"In other words, he thinks it would be fine for others to demand
that YOU do one hour of work for them a day for free, and that is
acceptable until more than 24 people have made that same demand."

Oh really? Can I have a quote?

--14dae9340e11b99ecb04d59589cb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

"The flaw in your example is "you TOOK someone's piece of mar=
ble." =A0You
may have added value to the marble FOR THE OWNER, if he likes your
statue. =A0Or, you may have REDUCED it's value to the owner, if he
intended to use the marble for a counter top. =A0The point being, that you<=
br>
cannot base "increased value" arguments when you base your premis=
e on
STEALING the item in the first place."This is not a flaw - thi=
s is the main point of the example.It shows that property right is not =
given by creation. The fact thatit was *you* who wrote the book does no=
t give you any property rights
over the copy of the book someone else bought. He now owns it. Thefact =
that you wrote the story does not now give you any property right in it.

"In other words, he thinks it would be fine for others to demand
that YOU do one hour of work for them a day for free, and that is
acceptable until more than 24 people have made that same demand."<=
br>Oh really? Can I have a quote?

--14dae9340e11b99ecb04d59589cb--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, James Harkins, (Wed Feb 13, 2:15 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 6:42 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 6:45 am)
[LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 3:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, Paul Davis, (Wed Feb 13, 3:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 4:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, Paul Davis, (Wed Feb 13, 4:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 5:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 9:35 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, michael noble, (Wed Feb 13, 7:45 am)
[LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, michael noble, (Wed Feb 13, 8:57 am)
[LAU] Changed: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 3:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 9:07 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Wed Feb 13, 6:49 am)