Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Al Thompson <althompson58@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 - 6:39 am

--20cf301d420e13bf5a04d581491c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I'll include a few quotes which led me to make my statement:

s
Yeah, IP is not about copyright only, it is about patents as well. He is
referring to the
arbitrary nature of those laws, when they "reward" one thing but not
another.
So it is not about music per se, it is about the idea of IP itself.

> "For example, your taking my lawnmower would not really deprive me of it

=94
.
This is a delicate moment. Things is, as soon as you set up a camp, a camp
becomes
a finite resource. And now it can be taken away.

Now, imagine if, at the moment you set a camp, anyone can come over and
just copy it
and it can be done infinitely. Would conflict be possible?

Also, bodies are scarce resources. And so anything involving bodies would
have grounds
for conflict. Imagine a land of paradise where everything is
super-abundant. But you would
still have conflicts, since you have only one body and you have a limited
resource called
"time". And so even in paradise some property rules would get established
concerning bodies.

But it is a huge topic and challenging. I think you took the correct
approach to absorb it and
think it over.

--=20
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/

--20cf301d420e13bf5a04d581491c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'll include a few quotes which led me to make my statement:

"In one recent case, the inventor of a new way to calculate a number
representing
the shortest path between two points=97an extremely useful technique=97was<=
br>
not given patent protection
because this was =93merely=94 a mathematical algorithm.47
But it is arbitrary and unfair to reward more practical inventors and
entertainment providers, such as the engineer
and songwriter, and to leave more theoretical science and math
researchers and philosophers unrewarded. The
distinction is inherently vague, arbitrary, and unjust."
Yeah, IP is not about copyright only, it is about=
patents as well. He is referring to thearbitrary nature of those laws,=
when they "reward" one thing but not another.So it is not ab=
out music per se, it is about the idea of IP itself.
=A0
"For example, your taking my lawnmower would not really deprive me of =
it
if I could conjure up another in the blink
of an eye. Lawnmower-taking in these circumstances would not be =93theft.=
=94
Property rights are not applicable to things
of infinite abundance, because there cannot be conflict over such things.
Thus, property rights must have objective, discernible borders, and must
be allocated in accordance with the first occupier
homesteading rule. Moreover, property rights can apply only to scarce
resources"

I'm still reading and absorbing. I am at odds with his stance in regard=
s
to even infinite resources (or abundant resources) in certain
circumstances. For instance, if I were in a region with VAST amounts of
uninhabited space, and I decided to set up my camp in one certain
location, and "stake my claim," I would have a problem with someo=
ne else
coming along, kicking me off, and taking over my "claim," even th=
ough it
would be possible for me to simply move and find another area to settle
on. If a person took over my original area, they would be operating
under the assumption that they had a superior right to that specific plot.<=
br>

This is a delicate moment. Things is,=
as soon as you set up a camp, a camp becomesa finite resource. And now=
it can be taken away.Now, imagine if, at the moment you set a camp=
, anyone can come over and just copy it
and it can be done infinitely. Would conflict be possible?Also, bod=
ies are scarce resources. And so anything involving bodies would have groun=
dsfor conflict. Imagine a land of paradise where everything is super-ab=
undant. But you would
still have conflicts, since you have only one body and you have a limited r=
esource called"time". And so even in paradise some property r=
ules would get established concerning bodies.But it is a huge topic=
and challenging. I think you took the correct approach to absorb it and
think it over.-- Loui=
gi Veronahttp://www.louigiveron=
a.ru/

--20cf301d420e13bf5a04d581491c--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Dave Phillips, (Tue Feb 5, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Roberto Suarez Soto, (Mon Feb 18, 9:25 am)
Re: [LAU] , , (Mon Feb 18, 4:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] , , (Mon Feb 18, 6:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 18, 11:47 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Chris Bannister, (Sat Feb 16, 8:54 am)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio..., Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sun Feb 10, 9:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio..., Harry van Haaren, (Mon Feb 11, 12:25 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Nils Gey, (Mon Feb 11, 12:36 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Harry van Haaren, (Mon Feb 11, 4:48 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Marije Baalman, (Mon Feb 11, 8:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Thomas Vecchione, (Mon Feb 11, 4:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Folderol, (Mon Feb 11, 8:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Thomas Vecchione, (Tue Feb 12, 4:07 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Marije Baalman, (Tue Feb 12, 11:42 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Thomas Vecchione, (Tue Feb 12, 10:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Paul Davis, (Wed Feb 13, 2:56 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Feb 13, 6:35 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 10:51 am)
Re: [LAU] LAC 2013, why not more students?, Raffaele Morelli, (Tue Feb 12, 12:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 10, 11:26 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, hermann meyer, (Sun Feb 10, 1:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sun Feb 10, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Dan MacDonald, (Sun Feb 10, 9:59 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Feb 10, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Dan MacDonald, (Sun Feb 10, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Johannes Kroll, (Tue Feb 5, 4:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Wed Feb 6, 9:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 5:41 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Thu Feb 7, 5:54 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 6:45 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Thu Feb 7, 6:54 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Thu Feb 7, 6:55 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 6:57 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Devin Anderson, (Thu Feb 7, 8:24 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Thu Feb 7, 4:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Thu Feb 7, 4:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louis Gorenfeld, (Thu Feb 7, 5:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 8:03 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 8:24 am)
[LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Tue Feb 12, 2:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Al Thompson, (Tue Feb 12, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Tue Feb 12, 11:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Al Thompson, (Wed Feb 13, 12:02 am)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, drew Roberts, (Wed Feb 13, 2:41 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Feb 13, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Louigi Verona, (Thu Feb 14, 4:54 am)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Feb 14, 9:16 am)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Feb 12, 11:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, Ralf Mardorf, (Tue Feb 12, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] Changerd: Copyright laws and such, david, (Tue Feb 12, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 7:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 3:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 10:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Louigi Verona, (Tue Feb 12, 6:39 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Feb 10, 3:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Feb 10, 4:10 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sun Feb 10, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, hermann meyer, (Fri Feb 8, 12:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 12:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 12:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 7, 12:44 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Thomas Vecchione, (Wed Feb 6, 1:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Robert Jonsson, (Tue Feb 5, 5:39 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Feb 5, 5:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Feb 5, 11:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Devin Anderson, (Tue Feb 5, 5:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Feb 5, 3:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Feb 5, 3:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Feb 5, 4:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Raffaele Morelli, (Wed Feb 6, 1:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Raffaele Morelli, (Thu Feb 7, 8:30 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Raffaele Morelli, (Fri Feb 8, 9:26 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Florian Paul Schmidt, (Fri Feb 8, 10:29 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Raffaele Morelli, (Thu Feb 7, 4:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sat Feb 9, 5:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, michael noble, (Wed Feb 6, 11:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, William Light, (Tue Feb 5, 11:57 pm)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Esteban Viveros, (Wed Feb 6, 3:22 am)
Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas, (Tue Feb 5, 7:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [LAD] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Tue Feb 5, 9:42 pm)