Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dave Phillips <dlphillips@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2013 - 9:08 pm

--e89a8f23468560375304d5794e2c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Dave Phillips wrote:

> On 02/11/2013 03:21 PM, Louigi Verona wrote:

i found it strangely ... punctuated.

almost as if it was trying to emphasize something over and over, but didn't
actually have anything to say.

--e89a8f23468560375304d5794e2c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Dave Ph=
illips <dlphillips@woh.rr.com> wrote:
On 02/11/2013 03:21 PM, Louigi Verona wrote:

Haha! Nice one )

I should use this, indeed: ************* ******** *************************=
************

One of my favorites. So soothing, almost tranquil.i f=
ound it strangely ... punctuated. almost as if it was trying to emp=
hasize something over and over, but didn't actually have anything to sa=
y.

--e89a8f23468560375304d5794e2c--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], James Harkins, (Mon Feb 11, 1:41 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis, (Mon Feb 11, 3:17 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], James Harkins, (Mon Feb 11, 2:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Louis Gorenfeld, (Mon Feb 11, 5:58 pm)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Simon Wise, (Mon Feb 11, 6:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 11, 2:47 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Bruno Gola, (Mon Feb 11, 2:53 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Fuck your sexism], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Feb 11, 3:57 am)
Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: **** your sexism], Chris Bannister, (Mon Feb 11, 10:18 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, David Baron, (Mon Feb 11, 10:53 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 11:15 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Chris Bannister, (Tue Feb 12, 10:44 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Chris Bannister, (Mon Feb 11, 1:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Florian Faber, (Mon Feb 11, 1:12 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Florian Faber, (Mon Feb 11, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Chris Bannister, (Tue Feb 12, 10:42 am)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Q, (Tue Feb 12, 12:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, david, (Mon Feb 11, 7:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 8:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Dave Phillips, (Mon Feb 11, 8:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Paul Davis, (Mon Feb 11, 9:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Louigi Verona, (Mon Feb 11, 10:40 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, david, (Mon Feb 11, 9:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] *** **** *** **** *** ****, Neil C Smith, (Mon Feb 11, 11:53 am)